↓ Skip to main content

Development of Industrial Brewing Yeast with Low Acetaldehyde Production and Improved Flavor Stability

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Development of Industrial Brewing Yeast with Low Acetaldehyde Production and Improved Flavor Stability
Published in
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12010-012-0077-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jinjing Wang, Nan Shen, Hua Yin, Chunfeng Liu, Yongxian Li, Qi Li

Abstract

Higher acetaldehyde concentration in beer is one of the main concerns of current beer industry in China. Acetaldehyde is always synthesized during beer brewing by the metabolism of yeast. Here, using ethanol as the sole carbon source and 4-methylpyrazole as the selection marker, we constructed a new mutant strain with lower acetaldehyde production and improved ethanol tolerance via traditional mutagenesis strategy. European Brewery Convention tube fermentation tests comparing the fermentation broths of mutant strain and industrial brewing strain showed that the acetaldehyde concentration of mutant strain was 81.67 % lower, whereas its resistant staling value was 1.0-fold higher. Owing to the mutation, the alcohol dehydrogenase activity of the mutant strain decreased to about 30 % of the wild-type strain. In the meantime, the fermentation performance of the newly screened strain has little difference compared with the wild-type strain, and there are no safety problems regarding the industrial usage of the mutant strain. Therefore, we suggest that the newly screened strain could be directly applied to brewing industry.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Master 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 7 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Linguistics 1 2%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,386,127
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#465
of 2,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,366
of 282,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology
#7
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,496 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.