| Title |
Recognizing Unmet Need in the Era of Targeted Therapy for CLL/SLL: “What's Past Is Prologue” (Shakespeare)CLL/SLL Unmet Need
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-1237 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anthony R. Mato, Matthew S. Davids, Jeff Sharman, Lindsey E. Roeker, Neil Kay, Arnon P. Kater, Kerry Rogers, Meghan C. Thompson, Joanna Rhodes, Andre Goy, Alan Skarbnik, Stephen J. Schuster, Constantine S. Tam, Toby A. Eyre, Susan O'Brien, Chadi Nabhan, Nicole Lamanna, Clare Sun, Mazyar Shadman, John M. Pagel, Chaitra Ujjani, Danielle Brander, Catherine C. Coombs, Nitin Jain, Chan Y. Cheah, Jennifer R. Brown, John F. Seymour, Jennifer A. Woyach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 58% |
| Scientists | 3 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,107,635
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#3,741
of 12,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,707
of 515,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#60
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 515,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.