↓ Skip to main content

Cell biology in model systems as the key to understanding corals

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Ecology & Evolution, May 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
29 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
281 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
482 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cell biology in model systems as the key to understanding corals
Published in
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, May 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginia M. Weis, Simon K. Davy, Ove Hoegh-Guldberg, Mauricio Rodriguez-Lanetty, John R. Pringle

Abstract

Corals provide the foundation of important tropical reef ecosystems but are in global decline for multiple reasons, including climate change. Coral health depends on a fragile partnership with intracellular dinoflagellate symbionts. We argue here that progress in understanding coral biology requires intensive study of the cellular processes underlying this symbiosis. Such study will inform us on how the coral symbiosis will be affected by climate change, mechanisms driving coral bleaching and disease, and the coevolution of this symbiosis in the context of other host-microbe interactions. Drawing lessons from the broader history of molecular and cell biology and the study of other host-microbe interactions, we argue that a model-systems approach is essential for making effective progress in understanding coral cell biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 482 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 2%
Germany 5 1%
Mexico 3 <1%
Taiwan 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 455 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 114 24%
Researcher 79 16%
Student > Master 73 15%
Student > Bachelor 69 14%
Professor 20 4%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 64 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 239 50%
Environmental Science 71 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 61 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 2%
Chemistry 7 1%
Other 23 5%
Unknown 71 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 233. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#162,691
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#63
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#246
of 96,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.