| Title |
Radiation exposure and risk–benefit analysis in cancer screening using FDG-PET: results of a Japanese nationwide survey
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Nuclear Medicine, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12149-011-0511-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takeshi Murano, Ryogo Minamimoto, Michio Senda, Kimiichi Uno, Seishi Jinnouchi, Hiroshi Fukuda, Takeshi Iinuma, Eriko Tsukamoto, Takashi Terauchi, Tsuyoshi Yoshida, Shinya Oku, Sadahiko Nishizawa, Kengo Ito, Kazuhiro Oguchi, Masami Kawamoto, Rumi Nakashima, Hiroshi Iwata, Tomio Inoue |
| Abstract |
The aim of this study was to estimate radiation exposure and evaluate the risks and benefits of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in cancer screening. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 25% |
| Researcher | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 50% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 15% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,159,409
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#260
of 633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,770
of 115,715 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Nuclear Medicine
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,715 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.