↓ Skip to main content

Lung cancer stage at diagnosis: Individual associations in the prospective VITamins and lifestyle (VITAL) cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Lung cancer stage at diagnosis: Individual associations in the prospective VITamins and lifestyle (VITAL) cohort
Published in
BMC Cancer, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-11-228
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher G Slatore, Michael K Gould, David H Au, Mark E Deffebach, Emily White

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Identifying factors associated with stage of diagnosis can improve our understanding of biologic and behavioral pathways of lung cancer development and detection. We used data from a prospective cohort study to evaluate associations of demographic, health history, and health behaviors with early versus late stage at diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 28%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Librarian 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 11 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,539,223
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,349
of 8,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,811
of 112,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#20
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.