↓ Skip to main content

Role of HPV in esophageal SCC

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of HPV in esophageal SCC
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, August 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2012.01555.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Surabhi S Liyanage, Eva Segelov, Suzanne M Garland, Sepehr N Tabrizi, Holly Seale, Philip J Crowe, Dominic E Dwyer, Andrew Barbour, Anthony T Newall, Aisha Malik, C Raina Macintyre

Abstract

Esophageal cancer (EC) is responsible for almost half a million deaths worldwide annually and has a multifactorial etiology, which may account for its geographical variation in incidence. In the last 30 years the potential of human papillomaviruses (HPV) as oncogenes or co-factors in the tumorigenic process of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been widely studied. While the etiology of HPV in cervical and certain other anogenital and aerodigestive cancers has been established, results regarding its role in EC have been largely inconclusive. A causal association can be evaluated only with a case-control study, where normal controls are compared to ESCC cases for the presence of HPV. We reviewed all studies investigating ESCC tissue for HPV DNA and identified 139 that met our inclusion criteria, of which only 22 were case-control studies. Our results support previous findings of higher levels of HPV detection in high-risk ESCC regions than in areas of low risk. In addition, we confirm that the role of HPV in ESCC remains unclear, despite an accumulation of studies on the subject. The variations in investigative technique, study design and sample types tested may account for the lack of consistency in results. There is a need for a meta-analysis of all case-control studies to date, and for large, well-designed case-control studies with adequate power to investigate the association. The potential benefits of prophylactic HPV vaccines could be evaluated if HPV is identified as an etiological factor in EC, highlighting the need for further research in this area.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Lecturer 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 12 27%
Unknown 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Computer Science 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2013.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#448
of 572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,162
of 185,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 572 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.