↓ Skip to main content

HIV infection: focus on the innate immune cells

Overview of attention for article published in Immunologic Research, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
HIV infection: focus on the innate immune cells
Published in
Immunologic Research, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12026-016-8862-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Milena S. Espíndola, Luana S. Soares, Leonardo J. Galvão-Lima, Fabiana A. Zambuzi, Maira C. Cacemiro, Verônica S. Brauer, Fabiani G. Frantz

Abstract

Innate immune cells play a critical role during the onset of HIV infection and remain active until the final events that characterize AIDS. The viral impact on innate immune cell response may be a result of direct infection or indirect modulation, and each cell type responds in a specific manner to HIV. During HIV infection, the immune system works in a dynamic way, where innate and adaptive cells contribute with each other stimulating their function and modulating phenotypes and consequently infection resolution. Understanding the alterations in the cell populations induced by the virus is pivotal and can help to combat HIV at the time of infection and above all, to prevent the establishment of viral reservoirs. In this review, we will describe the frequency and the subtypes of infected cells such as of monocytes, DCs, neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells/basophils, NK cells, NKT cells and γδ T cells, and we discuss the possibility of cell-targeting strategies. Our aim is to consolidate the existing knowledge of the interaction between HIV and cells that constitute the innate immune response.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 13 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 23 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 21 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 27 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,001,461
of 23,853,707 outputs
Outputs from Immunologic Research
#539
of 915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,332
of 341,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Immunologic Research
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,853,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.