↓ Skip to main content

Statistical judgments are influenced by the implied likelihood that samples represent the same population

Overview of attention for article published in Memory & Cognition, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
Title
Statistical judgments are influenced by the implied likelihood that samples represent the same population
Published in
Memory & Cognition, October 2011
DOI 10.3758/s13421-011-0155-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dana L. Chesney, Natalie A. Obrecht

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 67%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 13%
Linguistics 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 2 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,383,207
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#947
of 1,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,369
of 141,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.