↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences When Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Multilevel Modeling Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
89 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
Title
Gender Differences When Parenting Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Multilevel Modeling Approach
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s10803-012-1756-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leah Jones, Vasiliki Totsika, Richard P. Hastings, Michael A. Petalas

Abstract

Parenting a child with autism may differentially affect mothers and fathers. Existing studies of mother-father differences often ignore the interdependence of data within families. We investigated gender differences within-families using multilevel linear modeling. Mothers and fathers of children with autism (161 couples) reported on their own well-being, and their child's functioning. Mothers reported higher levels of distress compared with fathers, and child behavior problems predicted psychological distress for both mothers and fathers. We found little evidence of child functioning variables affecting mothers and fathers differently. Gender differences in the impact of child autism on parents appear to be robust. More family systems research is required to fully understand these gender differences and the implications for family support.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 16%
Researcher 23 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Other 24 11%
Unknown 45 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 98 46%
Social Sciences 26 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 12 6%
Unknown 49 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2013.
All research outputs
#4,226,764
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,721
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,956
of 288,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#15
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,513 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.