↓ Skip to main content

Induction of labor: does indication matter?

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 2,352)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Induction of labor: does indication matter?
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00404-016-4171-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rinat Gabbay-Benziv, Eran Hadar, Eran Ashwal, Rony Chen, Arnon Wiznitzer, Liran Hiersch

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 12 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 17 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2016.
All research outputs
#1,101,759
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#39
of 2,352 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,866
of 384,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,352 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 384,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.