↓ Skip to main content

The Helpseeking Experiences of Men Who Sustain Intimate Partner Violence: An Overlooked Population and Implications for Practice

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Family Violence, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 1,341)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
270 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user
reddit
7 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
196 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
Title
The Helpseeking Experiences of Men Who Sustain Intimate Partner Violence: An Overlooked Population and Implications for Practice
Published in
Journal of Family Violence, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10896-011-9382-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily M. Douglas, Denise A. Hines

Abstract

For over 30 years, research has shown that men can and do sustain intimate partner violence (IPV) from their female partners. This is the first large-scale, nationally-based, quantitative study to systematically detail the helpseeking experiences of men who have sustained IPV from their female partners. The sample is composed of 302 men who were recruited from resources specializing in men's issues. Results indicate that men who seek help for IPV victimization have the most positive experiences in seeking help from family/friends, and mental health and medical providers. They have the least positive experiences with members of the DV service system. Cumulative positive helpseeking experiences were associated with lower levels of abusing alcohol; cumulative negative experiences were associated with higher rates of exceeding a clinical cut-off for post-traumatic stress disorder. Results are discussed in terms of implications for the social service sector and for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 270 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 220 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Researcher 15 7%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 44 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 67 30%
Social Sciences 55 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 6%
Arts and Humanities 6 3%
Other 11 5%
Unknown 54 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 255. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#147,168
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family Violence
#3
of 1,341 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#441
of 123,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family Violence
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,341 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them