↓ Skip to main content

A systematic, large-scale study of synaesthesia: implications for the role of early experience in lexical-colour associations

Overview of attention for article published in Cognition, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
263 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic, large-scale study of synaesthesia: implications for the role of early experience in lexical-colour associations
Published in
Cognition, January 2005
DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

A.N. Rich, J.L. Bradshaw, J.B. Mattingley

Abstract

For individuals with synaesthesia, stimuli in one sensory modality elicit anomalous experiences in another modality. For example, the sound of a particular piano note may be 'seen' as a unique colour, or the taste of a familiar food may be 'felt' as a distinct bodily sensation. We report a study of 192 adult synaesthetes, in which we administered a structured questionnaire to determine the relative frequency and characteristics of different types of synaesthetic experience. Our data suggest the prevalence of synaesthesia in the adult population is approximately 1 in 1150 females and 1 in 7150 males. The incidence of left-handedness in our sample was within the normal range, contrary to previous claims. We did, however, find that synaesthetes are more likely to be involved in artistic pursuits, consistent with anecdotal reports. We also examined responses from a subset of 150 synaesthetes for whom letters, digits and words induce colour experiences ('lexical-colour' synaesthesia). There was a striking consistency in the colours induced by certain letters and digits in these individuals. For example, 'R' elicited red for 36% of the sample, 'Y' elicited yellow for 45%, and 'D' elicited brown for 47%. Similar trends were apparent for a group of non-synaesthetic controls who were asked to associate colours with letters and digits. Based on these findings, we suggest that the development of lexical-colour synaesthesia in many cases incorporates early learning experiences common to all individuals. Moreover, many of our synaesthetes experienced colours only for days of the week, letters or digits, suggesting that inducers that are part of a conventional sequence (e.g. Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday...; A, B, C...; 1, 2, 3...) may be particularly important in the development of synaesthetic inducer-colour pairs. We speculate that the learning of such sequences during an early critical period determines the particular pattern of lexical-colour links, and that this pattern then generalises to other words.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 9 3%
United States 4 1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 250 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 60 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 16%
Researcher 37 14%
Student > Master 33 12%
Professor 19 7%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 38 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 119 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Neuroscience 17 6%
Linguistics 15 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 3%
Other 41 15%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2020.
All research outputs
#2,863,399
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cognition
#910
of 3,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,516
of 151,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognition
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,272 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.