↓ Skip to main content

Energy-efficient cooking methods

Overview of attention for article published in Energy Efficiency, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Energy-efficient cooking methods
Published in
Energy Efficiency, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s12053-012-9173-7
Authors

Dilip K. De, Nathaniel Muwa Shawhatsu, Narendra Nath De, Mathias Ikechukwu Ajaeroh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 25%
Student > Master 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 11%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Energy 4 7%
Design 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,676,164
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Energy Efficiency
#267
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,247
of 171,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Energy Efficiency
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.