| Title |
Conservation implications of source-sink dynamics within populations of endangered Maculinea butterflies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Insect Conservation, August 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10841-016-9906-6 |
| Authors |
Natalia Timus, Zsolt Czekes, Laszlo Rákosy, Piotr Nowicki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 53 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2016.
All research outputs
#20,340,423
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#594
of 655 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,961
of 336,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#15
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 655 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,871 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.