| Title |
Introduction to “Binary Binds”: Deconstructing Sex and Gender Dichotomies in Archaeological Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10816-016-9296-9 |
| Authors |
Lara Ghisleni, Alexis M. Jordan, Emily Fioccoprile |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 39 | 34% |
| Arts and Humanities | 34 | 30% |
| Psychology | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 27 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,483,585
of 25,709,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#134
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,868
of 381,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,709,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.