↓ Skip to main content

Feed thickener for newborn infants with gastro‐oesophageal reflux

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feed thickener for newborn infants with gastro‐oesophageal reflux
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rae‐Chi Huang, David Forbes, Mark W Davies

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 56 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Other 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Other 14 23%
Unknown 11 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2013.
All research outputs
#17,298,769
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#10,656
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,307
of 47,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#28
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.