↓ Skip to main content

Experiences of health care providers with integrated HIV and reproductive health services in Kenya: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
232 Mendeley
Title
Experiences of health care providers with integrated HIV and reproductive health services in Kenya: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-13-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Mutemwa, Susannah Mayhew, Manuela Colombini, Joanna Busza, Jackline Kivunaga, Charity Ndwiga

Abstract

There is broad consensus on the value of integration of HIV services and reproductive health services in regions of the world with generalised HIV/AIDS epidemics and high reproductive morbidity. Integration is thought to increase access to and uptake of health services; and improves their efficiency and cost-effectiveness through better use of available resources. However, there is still very limited empirical literature on health service providers and how they experience and operationalize integration. This qualitative study was conducted among frontline health workers to explore provider experiences with integration in order to ascertain their significance to the performance of integrated health facilities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 223 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 53 23%
Researcher 36 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Other 44 19%
Unknown 54 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 14%
Social Sciences 33 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 3%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 59 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,038,765
of 23,505,010 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,395
of 7,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,025
of 286,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#42
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,010 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,843 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.