↓ Skip to main content

Improving Diagnosis of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia With Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET/CT

Overview of attention for article published in JCEM, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Improving Diagnosis of Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia With Gallium-68 DOTATATE PET/CT
Published in
JCEM, January 2013
DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-3642
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roderick J. Clifton-Bligh, Michael S. Hofman, Emma Duncan, Ie-Wen Sim, David Darnell, Adele Clarkson, Tricia Wong, John P. Walsh, Anthony J. Gill, Peter R. Ebeling, Rodney J. Hicks

Abstract

Tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) is a rarely diagnosed disorder presenting with bone pain, fractures, muscle weakness, and moderate-to-severe hypophosphatemia resulting from fibroblast growth factor 23-mediated renal phosphate wasting. Tumors secreting fibroblast growth factor 23 are often small and difficult to find with conventional imaging.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 43 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Professor 4 9%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 11 25%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 61%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#5,279
of 15,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,150
of 289,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#38
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.