↓ Skip to main content

Preparation of nanosize Pt clusters using ion exchange of Pt(NH3)42+ inside mesoporous channel of MCM-41

Overview of attention for article published in Catalysis Letters, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Preparation of nanosize Pt clusters using ion exchange of Pt(NH3)42+ inside mesoporous channel of MCM-41
Published in
Catalysis Letters, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00813515
Authors

Ryong Ryoo, Chang Hyun Ko, Ji Man Kim, Russell Howe

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 8%
Argentina 1 8%
Unknown 10 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 50%
Professor 2 17%
Researcher 2 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 5 42%
Chemical Engineering 2 17%
Physics and Astronomy 2 17%
Environmental Science 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2012.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Catalysis Letters
#208
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,246
of 25,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Catalysis Letters
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.