↓ Skip to main content

Colloidal aggregates tested via nanoindentation and quasi-simultaneous 3D imaging

Overview of attention for article published in The European Physical Journal E, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Colloidal aggregates tested via nanoindentation and quasi-simultaneous 3D imaging
Published in
The European Physical Journal E, November 2012
DOI 10.1140/epje/i2012-12124-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcel Roth, Carsten Schilde, Philipp Lellig, Arno Kwade, Günter K. Auernhammer

Abstract

The mechanical properties of aggregated colloids depend on the mutual interplay of inter-particle potentials, contact forces, aggregate structure and material properties of the bare particles. Owing to this variety of influences, experimental results from macroscopic mechanical testings were mostly compared to time-consuming, microscopic simulations rather than to analytical theories. The aim of the present paper was to relate both macroscopic and microscopic mechanical data with each other and simple analytical models. We investigated dense amorphous aggregates made from monodisperse poly-methyl methacrylate (PMMA) particles (diameter: 1.6 μm via nanoindentation in combination with confocal microscopy. The resulting macroscopic information was complemented by the three-dimensional aggregate structure as well as the microscopic strain field and strain tensor. The measured strain field and tensor were in reasonable agreement with the predictions from analytical continuum theories. Consequently, the measured force-depth curves could be analyzed within a theoretical framework that had been frequently used for nanoindentation of atomic matter such as metals, ceramics and polymers. The extracted values for hardness and effective Young's modulus represented average values characteristic of the aggregate. On the basis of of these parameters we discuss the influence of the strength of particle bonds by introducing polystyrene (PS) between the particles.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 5%
Malaysia 1 3%
Japan 1 3%
Unknown 33 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 24%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 6 16%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 7 19%
Physics and Astronomy 6 16%
Engineering 6 16%
Chemistry 4 11%
Chemical Engineering 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 7 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,821,622
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from The European Physical Journal E
#395
of 650 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,177
of 281,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The European Physical Journal E
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 650 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.