↓ Skip to main content

Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Geodesy, May 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
152 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Quality-control issues relating to instantaneous ambiguity resolution for real-time GPS kinematic positioning
Published in
Journal of Geodesy, May 1997
DOI 10.1007/s001900050103
Authors

S. Han

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 50 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 31%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 37%
Engineering 17 33%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2006.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Geodesy
#104
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,549
of 29,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Geodesy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them