↓ Skip to main content

Variation in Female Mate Choice within Guppy Populations: Population Divergence, Multiple Ornaments and the Maintenance of Polymorphism

Overview of attention for article published in Genetica, November 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 706)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Variation in Female Mate Choice within Guppy Populations: Population Divergence, Multiple Ornaments and the Maintenance of Polymorphism
Published in
Genetica, November 2002
DOI 10.1023/a:1021228308636
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Brooks

Abstract

The evolutionary significance of variation in mate choice behaviour is currently a subject of some debate and considerable empirical study. Here, I review recent work on variation within and among guppy (Poecilia reticulata) populations in female mate choice and mating preferences. Empirical results demonstrate that there is substantial variation within and among populations in female responsiveness and choosiness, and much of this variation is genetic. Evidence for variation in preference functions also exists, but this appears to be more equivocal and the relative importance of genetic variation is less clear cut. In the second half of this review I discuss the potential significance of this variation to three important evolutionary issues: the presence of multiple male ornaments, the maintenance of polymorphism and divergence in mate recognition among populations. Studies of genetic variation in mate choice within populations indicate that females have complex, multivariate preferences that are able to evolve independently to some extent. These findings suggest that the presence of multiple male ornaments may be due to multiple female mating preferences. The extreme polymorphism in male guppy colour patterns demands explanation, yet no single satisfactory explanation has yet emerged. I review several old ideas and a few new ones in order to identify the most promising potential explanations for future empirical testing. Among these are negative frequency dependent selection, environmental heterogeneity coupled with gene flow, and genetic constraints. Last, I review the relative extent of within and among-population variation in mate choice and mating preferences in order to assess why guppies have not speciated despite a history of isolation and divergence. I argue that variation within guppy populations in mate choice and enhanced mating success of new immigrants to a pool are major impediments to population divergence of the magnitude that would be required for speciation to occur.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 3%
Germany 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 159 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 24%
Researcher 32 18%
Student > Master 18 10%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Professor 9 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 121 68%
Environmental Science 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 34 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,811,909
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetica
#17
of 706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,884
of 52,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetica
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 706 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them