| Title |
Community embedded reproductive health interventions for adolescents in Latin America: development and evaluation of a complex multi-centre intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter Decat, Erica Nelson, Sarah De Meyer, Lina Jaruseviciene, Miguel Orozco, Zoyla Segura, Anna Gorter, Bernardo Vega, Kathya Cordova, Lea Maes, Marleen Temmerman, Els Leye, Olivier Degomme |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 3 | 75% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 250 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 54 | 21% |
| Researcher | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 7% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 55 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 38 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 14% |
| Psychology | 22 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 27 | 10% |
| Unknown | 64 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,628,748
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,220
of 17,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,286
of 293,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#40
of 275 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,761 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 293,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 275 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.