↓ Skip to main content

Elapsed time since BNT162b2 vaccine and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: test negative design study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
83 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1473 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
3 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Elapsed time since BNT162b2 vaccine and risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection: test negative design study
Published in
British Medical Journal, November 2021
DOI 10.1136/bmj-2021-067873
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ariel Israel, Eugene Merzon, Alejandro A Schäffer, Yotam Shenhar, Ilan Green, Avivit Golan-Cohen, Eytan Ruppin, Eli Magen, Shlomo Vinker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,473 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Professor 6 7%
Unspecified 6 7%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 29 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 25%
Unspecified 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 31 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1653. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,675
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#176
of 65,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280
of 518,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#9
of 814 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 65,061 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 518,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 814 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.