↓ Skip to main content

Where to for pelvic organ prolapse treatment after the FDA pronouncements?

Overview of attention for article published in International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
Where to for pelvic organ prolapse treatment after the FDA pronouncements?
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, January 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00192-012-2025-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. M. van Geelen, P. L. Dwyer

Abstract

With the publication of the updated US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) communication in 2011 on the use of transvaginal placement of mesh for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) it is appropriate to now review recent studies of good quality on POP to assess the safety and effectiveness of treatment options and determine their place in management.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 12%
Other 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 22 27%
Unknown 20 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 2%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2020.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#846
of 2,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,950
of 290,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Urogynecology Journal & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.