↓ Skip to main content

Biogeochemistry of beetle-killed forests: Explaining a weak nitrate response

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biogeochemistry of beetle-killed forests: Explaining a weak nitrate response
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, January 2013
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1221029110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charles C. Rhoades, James H. McCutchan, Leigh A. Cooper, David Clow, Thomas M. Detmer, Jennifer S. Briggs, John D. Stednick, Thomas T. Veblen, Rachel M. Ertz, Gene E. Likens, William M. Lewis

Abstract

A current pine beetle infestation has caused extensive mortality of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) in forests of Colorado and Wyoming; it is part of an unprecedented multispecies beetle outbreak extending from Mexico to Canada. In United States and European watersheds, where atmospheric deposition of inorganic N is moderate to low (<10 kg⋅ha⋅y), disturbance of forests by timber harvest or violent storms causes an increase in stream nitrate concentration that typically is close to 400% of predisturbance concentrations. In contrast, no significant increase in streamwater nitrate concentrations has occurred following extensive tree mortality caused by the mountain pine beetle in Colorado. A model of nitrate release from Colorado watersheds calibrated with field data indicates that stimulation of nitrate uptake by vegetation components unaffected by beetles accounts for significant nitrate retention in beetle-infested watersheds. The combination of low atmospheric N deposition (<10 kg⋅ha⋅y), tree mortality spread over multiple years, and high compensatory capacity associated with undisturbed residual vegetation and soils explains the ability of these beetle-infested watersheds to retain nitrate despite catastrophic mortality of the dominant canopy tree species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Chile 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 125 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 24%
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Master 25 19%
Professor 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 17 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 58 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 20%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 10%
Engineering 3 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 23 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2013.
All research outputs
#2,934,457
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#32,516
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,615
of 294,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#379
of 976 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 976 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.