| Title |
Tweeting nano: how public discourses about nanotechnology develop in social media environments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanoparticle Research, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11051-012-1381-8 |
| Authors |
Kristin K. Runge, Sara K. Yeo, Michael Cacciatore, Dietram A. Scheufele, Dominique Brossard, Michael Xenos, Ashley Anderson, Doo-hun Choi, Jiyoun Kim, Nan Li, Xuan Liang, Maria Stubbings, Leona Yi-Fan Su |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 64% |
| Italy | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 55% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 78 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 28% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 22% |
| Unknown | 12 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 31 | 37% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2018.
All research outputs
#2,726,425
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#47
of 902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,051
of 280,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanoparticle Research
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 902 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.