↓ Skip to main content

Gambling on the Lottery: Sociodemographic Correlates Across the Lifespan

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Gambling Studies, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 1,000)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
91 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Gambling on the Lottery: Sociodemographic Correlates Across the Lifespan
Published in
Journal of Gambling Studies, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10899-010-9228-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Grace M. Barnes, John W. Welte, Marie-Cecile O. Tidwell, Joseph H. Hoffman

Abstract

Two representative U.S. telephone surveys of gambling were conducted-an adult survey of adults aged 18 years and older (n = 2,631) and a youth survey of young people aged 14-21 years old (n = 2,274). Because the questions and methods were the same or similar in both surveys, the data from these two surveys were combined into a single dataset to examine the prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of gambling and problem gambling across the lifespan. The present work focused specifically on gambling on the lottery which is the most prevalent form of gambling in the U.S. The frequency of gambling on the lottery increased sharply from mid adolescence to age 18 which is the legal age to purchase lottery tickets in most states; lottery play continued to increase into the thirties when it leveled off and remained high through the sixties and then decreased among those 70 years and older. Considering multiple sociodemographic factors together in a negative binomial regression, the average number of days of lottery gambling was significantly predicted by male gender, age, neighborhood disadvantage and whether or not lottery was legal in the state where the respondent lived. These findings can be used to inform policies regarding lotteries in the U.S.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 18%
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 13 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 31%
Social Sciences 9 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 6%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 771. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#25,582
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 1,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60
of 192,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them