| Title |
The Spatial Distribution of Chacma Baboon (Papio ursinus) Habitat Based on an Environmental Envelope Model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Primatology, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10764-013-9669-9 |
| Authors |
Olivia M. L. Stone, Shawn W. Laffan, Darren Curnoe, Andy I. R. Herries |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 62 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 11 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 38% |
| Environmental Science | 15 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#5,763,541
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#402
of 1,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,874
of 197,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.