You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mutational signatures in esophageal adenocarcinoma define etiologically distinct subgroups with therapeutic relevance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Genetics, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ng.3659 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Secrier, Xiaodun Li, Nadeera de Silva, Matthew D Eldridge, Gianmarco Contino, Jan Bornschein, Shona MacRae, Nicola Grehan, Maria O'Donovan, Ahmad Miremadi, Tsun-Po Yang, Lawrence Bower, Hamza Chettouh, Jason Crawte, Núria Galeano-Dalmau, Anna Grabowska, John Saunders, Tim Underwood, Nicola Waddell, Andrew P Barbour, Barbara Nutzinger, Achilleas Achilleos, Paul A W Edwards, Andy G Lynch, Simon Tavaré, Rebecca C Fitzgerald |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 26% |
| United States | 11 | 22% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 14 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 48% |
| Scientists | 19 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 392 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 89 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 7% |
| Other | 57 | 14% |
| Unknown | 81 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 95 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 95 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 61 | 15% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 9% |
| Unknown | 92 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#172,683
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Genetics
#250
of 7,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,402
of 349,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Genetics
#9
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.