↓ Skip to main content

The Potential of Adipose Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 1,060)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
11 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
389 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
Title
The Potential of Adipose Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine
Published in
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports, September 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12015-010-9193-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bettina Lindroos, Riitta Suuronen, Susanna Miettinen

Abstract

Adipose stem cells (ASCs) are an attractive and abundant stem cell source with therapeutic applicability in diverse fields for the repair and regeneration of acute and chronically damaged tissues. Importantly, unlike the human bone marrow stromal/stem stem cells (BMSCs) that are present at low frequency in the bone marrow, ASCs can be retrieved in high number from either liposuction aspirates or subcutaneous adipose tissue fragments and can easily be expanded in vitro. ASCs display properties similar to that observed in BMSCs and, upon induction, undergo at least osteogenic, chondrogenic, adipogenic and neurogenic, differentiation in vitro. Furthermore, ASCs have been shown to be immunoprivileged, prevent severe graft-versus-host disease in vitro and in vivo and to be genetically stable in long-term culture. They have also proven applicability in other functions, such as providing hematopoietic support and gene transfer. Due to these characteristics, ASCs have rapidly advanced into clinical trials for treatment of a broad range of conditions. As cell therapies are becoming more frequent, clinical laboratories following good manufacturing practices are needed. At the same time as laboratory processes become more extensive, the need for control in the processing laboratory grows consequently involving a greater risk of complications and possibly adverse events for the recipient. Therefore, the safety, reproducibility and quality of the stem cells must thoroughly be examined prior to extensive use in clinical applications. In this review, some of the aspects of examination on ASCs in vitro and the utilization of ASCs in clinical studies are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 411 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 18%
Student > Master 70 17%
Researcher 61 14%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 8%
Other 54 13%
Unknown 75 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 105 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 62 15%
Engineering 27 6%
Materials Science 12 3%
Other 46 11%
Unknown 86 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,880,989
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#24
of 1,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,629
of 110,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.