↓ Skip to main content

Emergency care capacity in Africa: A clinical and educational initiative in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Public Health Policy, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
220 Mendeley
Title
Emergency care capacity in Africa: A clinical and educational initiative in Tanzania
Published in
Journal of Public Health Policy, December 2012
DOI 10.1057/jphp.2012.41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Teri A Reynolds, Juma A Mfinanga, Hendry R Sawe, Michael S Runyon, Victor Mwafongo

Abstract

Even though sub-Saharan Africa faces a disproportionate burden of acute injury and illness, few clinical facilities are configured to take an integrated approach to resuscitation and stabilization. Emergency care is a high-impact and cost-effective form of secondary prevention; disease surveillance at facilities delivering acute and emergency care is essential to guide primary prevention. Barriers to emergency care implementation in the region include limited documentation of the acute disease burden, a lack of consensus on regionally appropriate metrics to facilitate impact evaluation, and the lack of coordinated advocacy for acute disease prevention and emergency care. Despite these challenges, interest in creating dedicated acute care facilities and emergency training programs is rapidly expanding in Africa. We describe one such initiative at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, with a focus on the development of the emergency medicine residency program.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 215 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 22%
Researcher 29 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 11%
Student > Postgraduate 20 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 40 18%
Unknown 46 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 10%
Social Sciences 14 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 55 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,850,085
of 23,978,283 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Health Policy
#186
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,181
of 286,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Health Policy
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,978,283 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.