↓ Skip to main content

The role of poetry and prose in medical education: the pen as mighty as the scalpel?

Overview of attention for article published in Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
The role of poetry and prose in medical education: the pen as mighty as the scalpel?
Published in
Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs, March 2012
DOI 10.1007/s40037-012-0008-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frank J. Wolters, Marjo Wijnen-Meijer

Abstract

The current medical students' training on communication skills does not completely fulfil its purpose, since it often lacks attention to the various aspects essential for developing an empathic capacity. Besides having an active component in empathy, cognitive and affective aspects are of equal importance. Integration of arts and humanities courses into the curriculum might bridge this gap. Empathy results mainly from recognition and acknowledgement of a wide spectrum of emotions in patients, their relatives and doctors themselves. Artistic forms of reflection can promote insight into these emotions, complementary to the current teachings which focus on the active component of empathy. Based on several psychological and didactic views, as well as multicentre experience mainly from the United Kingdom and United States, poetry and prose can contribute to sustained development of empathy in medical students.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Student > Master 8 13%
Researcher 5 8%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 48%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Linguistics 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 17 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2022.
All research outputs
#6,237,961
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#246
of 574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,592
of 169,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tijdschrift voor Medisch Onderwijs
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.