| Title |
Comparative mapping in watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. et Nakai]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Theoretical and Applied Genetics, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00122-012-1938-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine Sandlin, Jason Prothro, Adam Heesacker, Nelly Khalilian, Rebecca Okashah, Wenwen Xiang, Eleni Bachlava, David G. Caldwell, Chris A. Taylor, Danelle K. Seymour, Victoria White, Eva Chan, Greg Tolla, Cathy White, Dolores Safran, Elaine Graham, Steven Knapp, Cecilia McGregor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 16 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,965,094
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#707
of 3,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,045
of 168,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Theoretical and Applied Genetics
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,565 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,144 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.