| Title |
Distal forearm fracture in the adult: is ORIF of the radius and closed reduction of the ulna a treatment option in distal forearm fracture?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00402-008-0645-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Gschwentner, Rohit Arora, Markus Wambacher, Markus Gabl, Martin Lutz |
| Abstract |
Distal forearm fractures in younger adults are rare injuries resulting from high energy trauma. Treatment options vary from cast fixation, external fixator, percutaneus pinning and open reduction and internal fixation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 16% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 8 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 56% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#16,049,105
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#737
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,960
of 80,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.