↓ Skip to main content

Exercise Prescription in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
272 Mendeley
Title
Exercise Prescription in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1007/s40279-012-0004-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ciara O’Hagan, Giuseppe De Vito, Colin A. G. Boreham

Abstract

Exercise is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus, resulting in stabilization of plasma glucose in the acute phase and improvements in body composition, insulin resistance and glycosylated haemoglobin with chronic exercise training. However, the most appropriate exercise prescription for type 2 diabetes has not yet been established, resulting from insufficient evidence to determine the optimum type, intensity, duration or frequency of exercise training. Furthermore, patient engagement in exercise is suboptimal. There are many likely reasons for low engagement in exercise; one possible contributory factor may be a tendency for expert bodies to prioritize the roles of diet and medication over exercise in their treatment guidelines. Published treatment guidelines vary in their approach to exercise training, but most agencies suggest that people with type 2 diabetes engage in 150 min of moderate to vigorous aerobic exercise per week. This prescription is similar to the established guidelines for cardiovascular health in the general population. Future possibilities in this area include investigation of the physiological effects and practical benefits of exercise training of different intensities in type 2 diabetes, and the use of individualized prescription to maximize the health benefits of training.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 272 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 259 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 18%
Student > Master 43 16%
Researcher 26 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 57 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 68 25%
Sports and Recreations 57 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 28 10%
Unknown 62 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#920,527
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#816
of 2,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,480
of 280,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#14
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.