↓ Skip to main content

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Daily Living Skills in Children with High-Functioning Autism and Concurrent Anxiety Disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
111 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
352 Mendeley
Title
Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Daily Living Skills in Children with High-Functioning Autism and Concurrent Anxiety Disorders
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10803-010-1037-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy Drahota, Jeffrey J. Wood, Karen M. Sze, Marilyn Van Dyke

Abstract

CBT is a promising treatment for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) and focuses, in part, on children's independence and self-help skills. In a trial of CBT for anxiety in ASD (Wood et al. in J Child Psychol Psychiatry 50:224-234, 2009), children's daily living skills and related parental intrusiveness were assessed. Forty children with ASD (7-11 years) and their primary caregiver were randomly assigned to an immediate treatment (IT; n = 17) or 3-month waitlist (WL; n = 23) condition. In comparison to WL, IT parents reported increases in children's total and personal daily living skills, and reduced involvement in their children's private daily routines. Reductions correlated with reduced anxiety severity. These results provide preliminary evidence that CBT may yield increased independence and daily living skills among children with ASD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 352 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 339 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 14%
Student > Bachelor 41 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 11%
Researcher 34 10%
Other 63 18%
Unknown 70 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 145 41%
Social Sciences 37 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Other 24 7%
Unknown 81 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,076,933
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,368
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,665
of 98,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#10
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.