↓ Skip to main content

The Trivalent Copper Complex of a Conjugated Bis-dithiocarbazate Schiff Base: Stabilization of Cu in Three Different Oxidation States

Overview of attention for article published in Inorganic Chemistry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Trivalent Copper Complex of a Conjugated Bis-dithiocarbazate Schiff Base: Stabilization of Cu in Three Different Oxidation States
Published in
Inorganic Chemistry, January 2013
DOI 10.1021/ic302596h
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammad Akbar Ali, Paul V. Bernhardt, Mathilde A. H. Brax, Jason England, Anthony J. Farlow, Graeme R. Hanson, Lee Len Yeng, Aminul Huq Mirza, Karl Wieghardt

Abstract

The new tribasic N(2)S(2) ligand H(3)ttfasbz has been synthesized by condensation of 4-thenoyl 2,2,2-trifluoroacetone and S-benzyl dithiocarbazate. On complexation with copper(II) acetate, spontaneous oxidation to the Cu(III) oxidation state is observed, and the complex [Cu(ttfasbz)] has been isolated and characterized structurally. Reduction to the EPR active Cu(II) analogue has been achieved chemically and also electrochemically, and in both cases, the process is totally reversible. The Cu(III/II) redox potential of the complex is remarkably low and similar to that of the ferrocenium/ferrocene couple. Further reduction to the formally monovalent (d(10)) dianion [Cu(I)(ttfasbz)](2-) may be achieved electrochemically. Computational chemistry demonstrates that the three redox states [Cu(ttfasbz)], [Cu(ttfasbz)](-), and [Cu(ttfasbz)](2-) are truly Cu(III), Cu(II), and Cu(I) complexes, respectively, and the potentially noninnocent ligand does not undergo any redox reactions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 50%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Master 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 2%
Professor 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 28 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Unknown 11 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,261,106
of 22,693,205 outputs
Outputs from Inorganic Chemistry
#13,655
of 21,527 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,188
of 284,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inorganic Chemistry
#164
of 386 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,693,205 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,527 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 386 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.