↓ Skip to main content

The helpfulness of category labels in semi-supervised learning depends on category structure

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The helpfulness of category labels in semi-supervised learning depends on category structure
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, June 2015
DOI 10.3758/s13423-015-0857-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wai Keen Vong, Daniel J. Navarro, Andrew Perfors

Abstract

The study of semi-supervised category learning has generally focused on how additional unlabeled information with given labeled information might benefit category learning. The literature is also somewhat contradictory, sometimes appearing to show a benefit to unlabeled information and sometimes not. In this paper, we frame the problem differently, focusing on when labels might be helpful to a learner who has access to lots of unlabeled information. Using an unconstrained free-sorting categorization experiment, we show that labels are useful to participants only when the category structure is ambiguous and that people's responses are driven by the specific set of labels they see. We present an extension of Anderson's Rational Model of Categorization that captures this effect.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 28 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 32%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 48%
Computer Science 3 10%
Linguistics 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 26%