| Title |
Task specificity of attention training: the case of probability cuing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13414-014-0747-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yuhong V. Jiang, Khena M. Swallow, Bo-Yeong Won, Julia D. Cistera, Gail M. Rosenbaum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 39 | 55% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,287,458
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#848
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,530
of 234,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
#20
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.