You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Characteristics of smartphone-based dietary assessment tools: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Psychology Review, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17437199.2021.2016066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura M. König, Miranda Van Emmenis, Johanna Nurmi, Aikaterini Kassavou, Stephen Sutton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 14% |
| Austria | 2 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
| Scientists | 8 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 25 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 3 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,138,122
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology Review
#134
of 351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,649
of 517,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology Review
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.