↓ Skip to main content

Isolation rearing effects on probabilistic learning and cognitive flexibility in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
Title
Isolation rearing effects on probabilistic learning and cognitive flexibility in rats
Published in
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, August 2013
DOI 10.3758/s13415-013-0204-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nurith Amitai, Jared W. Young, Kerin Higa, Richard F. Sharp, Mark A. Geyer, Susan B. Powell

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 98 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 28%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 8 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 19 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 18%
Neuroscience 14 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2016.
All research outputs
#16,287,458
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#618
of 974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,199
of 201,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
#16
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.