↓ Skip to main content

Effect of probiotics and synbiotics on blood glucose: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
221 Mendeley
Title
Effect of probiotics and synbiotics on blood glucose: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00394-016-1300-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elham Nikbakht, Saman Khalesi, Indu Singh, Lauren Therese Williams, Nicholas P. West, Natalie Colson

Abstract

High fasting blood glucose (FBG) can lead to chronic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular and kidney diseases. Consuming probiotics or synbiotics may improve FBG. A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials was conducted to clarify the effect of probiotic and synbiotic consumption on FBG levels. PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases were searched for relevant studies based on eligibility criteria. Randomized or non-randomized controlled trials which investigated the efficacy of probiotics or synbiotics on the FBG of adults were included. Studies were excluded if they were review articles and study protocols, or if the supplement dosage was not clearly mentioned. A total of fourteen studies (eighteen trials) were included in the analysis. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for the mean difference in FBG. Overall reduction in FBG observed from consumption of probiotics and synbiotics was borderline statistically significant (-0.18 mmol/L 95 % CI -0.37, 0.00; p = 0.05). Neither probiotic nor synbiotic subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in FBG. The result of subgroup analysis for baseline FBG level ≥7 mmol/L showed a reduction in FBG of 0.68 mmol/L (-1.07, -0.29; ρ < 0.01), while trials with multiple species of probiotics showed a more pronounced reduction of 0.31 mmol/L (-0.58, -0.03; ρ = 0.03) compared to single species trials. This meta-analysis suggests that probiotic and synbiotic supplementation may be beneficial in lowering FBG in adults with high baseline FBG (≥7 mmol/L) and that multispecies probiotics may have more impact on FBG than single species.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 221 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 219 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 15%
Student > Master 27 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 30 14%
Unknown 75 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 25 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 3%
Other 28 13%
Unknown 82 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2018.
All research outputs
#737,206
of 22,886,568 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#197
of 2,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,530
of 336,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#3
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,886,568 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.