| Title |
A formal analysis of bluetooth device discovery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, July 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10009-006-0014-x |
| Authors |
Marie Duflot, Marta Kwiatkowska, Gethin Norman, David Parker |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 20 | 51% |
| Engineering | 8 | 21% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,906,861
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#7
of 116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,253
of 65,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 116 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them