↓ Skip to main content

Meta-analyses identify DNA methylation associated with kidney function and damage

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Readers on

mendeley
100 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Meta-analyses identify DNA methylation associated with kidney function and damage
Published in
Nature Communications, December 2021
DOI 10.1038/s41467-021-27234-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascal Schlosser, Adrienne Tin, Pamela R. Matias-Garcia, Chris H. L. Thio, Roby Joehanes, Hongbo Liu, Antoine Weihs, Zhi Yu, Anselm Hoppmann, Franziska Grundner-Culemann, Josine L. Min, Adebowale A. Adeyemo, Charles Agyemang, Johan Ärnlöv, Nasir A. Aziz, Andrea Baccarelli, Murielle Bochud, Hermann Brenner, Monique M. B. Breteler, Cristian Carmeli, Layal Chaker, John C. Chambers, Shelley A. Cole, Josef Coresh, Tanguy Corre, Adolfo Correa, Simon R. Cox, Niek de Klein, Graciela E. Delgado, Arce Domingo-Relloso, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Arif B. Ekici, Karlhans Endlich, Kathryn L. Evans, James S. Floyd, Myriam Fornage, Lude Franke, Eliza Fraszczyk, Xu Gao, Xīn Gào, Mohsen Ghanbari, Sahar Ghasemi, Christian Gieger, Philip Greenland, Megan L. Grove, Sarah E. Harris, Gibran Hemani, Peter Henneman, Christian Herder, Steve Horvath, Lifang Hou, Mikko A. Hurme, Shih-Jen Hwang, Marjo-Riitta Jarvelin, Sharon L. R. Kardia, Silva Kasela, Marcus E. Kleber, Wolfgang Koenig, Jaspal S. Kooner, Holly Kramer, Florian Kronenberg, Brigitte Kühnel, Terho Lehtimäki, Lars Lind, Dan Liu, Yongmei Liu, Donald M. Lloyd-Jones, Kurt Lohman, Stefan Lorkowski, Ake T. Lu, Riccardo E. Marioni, Winfried März, Daniel L. McCartney, Karlijn A. C. Meeks, Lili Milani, Pashupati P. Mishra, Matthias Nauck, Ana Navas-Acien, Christoph Nowak, Annette Peters, Holger Prokisch, Bruce M. Psaty, Olli T. Raitakari, Scott M. Ratliff, Alex P. Reiner, Sylvia E. Rosas, Ben Schöttker, Joel Schwartz, Sanaz Sedaghat, Jennifer A. Smith, Nona Sotoodehnia, Hannah R. Stocker, Silvia Stringhini, Johan Sundström, Brenton R. Swenson, Maria Tellez-Plaza, Joyce B. J. van Meurs, Jana V. van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, Andrea Venema, Niek Verweij, Rosie M. Walker, Matthias Wielscher, Juliane Winkelmann, Bruce H. R. Wolffenbuttel, Wei Zhao, Yinan Zheng, Marie Loh, Harold Snieder, Daniel Levy, Melanie Waldenberger, Katalin Susztak, Anna Köttgen, Alexander Teumer

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 100 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 52 52%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 59 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,362,108
of 32,978,806 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#44,760
of 79,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,495
of 560,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#983
of 1,560 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,978,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 79,906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 49.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 560,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,560 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.