| Title |
ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10633-011-9296-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Donald C. Hood, Michael Bach, Mitchell Brigell, David Keating, Mineo Kondo, Jonathan S. Lyons, Michael F. Marmor, Daphne L. McCulloch, Anja M. Palmowski-Wolfe, For the International Society For Clinical Electrophysiology of Vision |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 279 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 15% |
| Researcher | 37 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 68 | 23% |
| Unknown | 54 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 134 | 46% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 6% |
| Engineering | 16 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 67 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,444,123
of 25,363,868 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#28
of 484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,869
of 153,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,868 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 484 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 153,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them