↓ Skip to main content

A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
416 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A social–ecological approach to conservation planning: embedding social considerations
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, May 2013
DOI 10.1890/110205
Authors

Natalie C Ban, Morena Mills, Jordan Tam, Christina C Hicks, Sarah Klain, Natalie Stoeckl, Madeleine C Bottrill, Jordan Levine, Robert L Pressey, Terre Satterfield, Kai MA Chan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
Canada 7 <1%
Australia 6 <1%
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Sweden 5 <1%
India 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Other 19 2%
Unknown 1039 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 231 21%
Student > Master 211 19%
Researcher 172 16%
Student > Bachelor 82 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 53 5%
Other 160 15%
Unknown 192 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 418 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 224 20%
Social Sciences 103 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 2%
Arts and Humanities 15 1%
Other 69 6%
Unknown 248 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,392,768
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#1,026
of 1,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,078
of 206,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 37.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.