↓ Skip to main content

Genotype-phenotype associations in dilated cardiomyopathy: meta-analysis on more than 8000 individuals

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Research in Cardiology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
169 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Genotype-phenotype associations in dilated cardiomyopathy: meta-analysis on more than 8000 individuals
Published in
Clinical Research in Cardiology, August 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00392-016-1033-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elham Kayvanpour, Farbod Sedaghat-Hamedani, Ali Amr, Alan Lai, Jan Haas, Daniel B. Holzer, Karen S. Frese, Andreas Keller, Katrin Jensen, Hugo A. Katus, Benjamin Meder

Abstract

Routine genetic testing in Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM) has recently become reality using Next-Generation Sequencing. Several studies have explored the relationship between genotypes and clinical phenotypes to support risk estimation and therapeutic decisions, however, most studies are small or restricted to a few genes. This study provides to our knowledge the first systematic meta-analysis on genotype-phenotype associations in DCM. We retrieved PubMed/Medline literature on genotype-phenotype associations in patients with DCM and mutations in LMNA, PLN, RBM20, MYBPC3, MYH7, TNNT2 and TNNI3. We summarized and extensively reviewed all studies that passed selection criteria and performed a meta-analysis on key phenotypic parameters. Together, 48 studies with 8097 patients were included. Furthermore, we reviewed recent studies investigating genotype-phenotype associations in DCM patients with TTN mutations. The average frequency of mutations in the investigated genes was between 1 and 5 %. The mean age of DCM onset was the beginning of the fifth decade for all genes. Heart transplantation (HTx) rate was highest in LMNA mutation carriers (27 %), while RBM20 mutation carriers were transplanted at a markedly younger age (mean 28.5 years). While 73 % of DCM patients with LMNA mutations showed cardiac conduction diseases, low voltage was the reported ECG hallmark in PLN mutation carriers. The frequency of ventricular arrhythmia in DCM patients with LMNA (50 %) and PLN (43 %) mutations was significantly higher. The penetrance of DCM phenotype in subjects with TTN truncating variants increased with age and reached 100 % by age of 70. A pooled analysis of available genotype-phenotype data shows a higher prevalence of sudden cardiac death (SCD), cardiac transplantation, or ventricular arrhythmias in LMNA and PLN mutation carriers compared to sarcomeric gene mutations. This study will further support the clinical interpretation of genetic findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 203 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 18%
Researcher 30 15%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 7%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 48 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Chemistry 3 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 1%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 56 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2019.
All research outputs
#3,677,373
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#148
of 1,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,787
of 353,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.