Title |
Multiple aspects of unnaturalness: are cisgenic crops perceived as being more natural and more acceptable than transgenic crops?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Agriculture and Human Values, February 2013
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10460-013-9430-1 |
Authors |
Henrik Mielby, Peter Sandøe, Jesper Lassen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 25% |
Student > Master | 10 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 36% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Philosophy | 3 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 16 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,255,951
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Agriculture and Human Values
#132
of 888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,681
of 297,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Agriculture and Human Values
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,048 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.