You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
An International Survey of the Public Engagement Practices of Health Technology Assessment Organizations
|
---|---|
Published in |
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.011 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jennifer A. Whitty |
Abstract |
Many jurisdictions are moving toward greater public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) processes. This study aims to provide a broad, cross-sectional indication of the extent and methods of public engagement in HTA, with a focus on which public are engaged, by what mechanisms, and the purpose of public engagement. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 179 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 38 | 21% |
Researcher | 36 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
Other | 9 | 5% |
Other | 28 | 15% |
Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 21% |
Social Sciences | 24 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 19 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 5% |
Computer Science | 8 | 4% |
Other | 42 | 23% |
Unknown | 44 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#2,244
of 4,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,589
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.