↓ Skip to main content

An International Survey of the Public Engagement Practices of Health Technology Assessment Organizations

Overview of attention for article published in Value in Health (Elsevier Science), January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An International Survey of the Public Engagement Practices of Health Technology Assessment Organizations
Published in
Value in Health (Elsevier Science), January 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.jval.2012.09.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer A. Whitty

Abstract

Many jurisdictions are moving toward greater public involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) processes. This study aims to provide a broad, cross-sectional indication of the extent and methods of public engagement in HTA, with a focus on which public are engaged, by what mechanisms, and the purpose of public engagement.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 180 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 21%
Researcher 36 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 9 5%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 43 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 21%
Social Sciences 24 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 5%
Computer Science 8 4%
Other 43 23%
Unknown 44 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2013.
All research outputs
#14,387,928
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#2,244
of 4,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,589
of 288,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Value in Health (Elsevier Science)
#20
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.